Wikipedia's Web 2.0 was a bit too technical for me in parts, but one thing that stuck was the mention of Amazon's having made user comments available predates Web 2.0 as a term or concept.
Walt Crawford's Library 2.0 and "Library 2.0" was tedious to plow through although some of his overarching perspectives were noteworthy as I interpret them:
- "Library 2.0" is unnecessarily confrontational and potentially alienating;
- implying that anything previous to "Library 2.0" is worthless is throwing the baby out with the bathwater;
- over-emphasis on the technology side of Library 2.0 may increase the chasm between the haves and have-nots among our patrons;
- "Library 2.0" advocates who describe their patrons as tec-savvy may not necessarily be describing all their patrons;
- "Library 2.0" doesn't directly address one of the library's most primary missions: circulating books and other materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment